Search for: "Michael Bahn"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2008, 11:51 am
Michael Jackson It should come as no surprise that Michael Jackson has inspired overwhelming obsession: For a while, he seemed to be the most famous person on the planet. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Deutsche Bahn AG (IPKat) Bundesgerichtshof deals with feature of patent claim not originally disclosed but the deletion of which would lead to broadened scope: Winkelmesseinrichtung (Kluwer Patent Blog) Bundespatentgericht: A simple ‘kiss’ may be enough to make the difference… word mark BUTTERFLY vs figurative mark BUTTERFLY KISS (Class 46) India India will not accept IP talks outside of WTO (Michael Geist) Justice Sridevan appointed as IPAB Chairman (Spicy IP)… [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Access Copyright (IP Osgoode) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CIPO Wares and Services Manual contracts again (Trade Mark Blog) Robertson class action settlement #2 decision released: Heather Robertson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
INPI (Kluwer Patent Blog) Germany Deutsche Bahn: combination of grey and red colours remain free to use by competitors in railway sector (Class 46) Court of Appeal The Hague: No infringement, no equivalence: AGA v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
– Supreme Court allows registration of car design (Class 99) Press conference: DaVinci Furniture GM’s nose grows longer than Pinocchio’s – export-and-import scheme to sell China made furniture as Italian made (IP Dragon) Anti-monopoly law and practice in China: A must read (China Law Blog) Europe EU announces €7B for innovation, RD (IP Watch) Europe falling further behind in innovation says new Commission’s ‘Innovation Union Competitiveness Report… [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Nov 20, 2007) (NO. 2094)Bahn Herzfeld & Multer LLP, New York (Richard L. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(IPKat) EPO BoA on public prior use and burden of proof: Circular fluorescent lamp / Osram (Kluwer Patent Blog) General Court annuls BoA’s decision for errors of law, OD was wrong to rule out absence of likelihood of confusion: Deutsche Bahn v OHIM – DSB (IC4) (Class 46) General Court on time-limit for filing appeal against OD decision where the latter is the object of a revocation procedure initiated by OHIM: Case T-36/09 (Class 46) TM assignment, CTM & the Poteen: General… [read post]
